package com.zhenhunfan.design.pattern.principle._01_singleresponsibility;

/**
 * <p>Title: Demo2</p>
 * <p>Description: </p>
 *
 * @author zhenhunfan
 * @version 1.0.0
 * @date 2021/2/27
 */
public class Demo2 {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        RoadVehicle roadVehicle = new RoadVehicle();
        roadVehicle.run("摩托车");
        roadVehicle.run("汽车");

        AirVehicle airVehicle = new AirVehicle();
        airVehicle.run("飞机");
    }
}
//方案2的分析
//1.遵守单一职责原则
//2.但是这样做的改动很大，即将类分解，同时修改客户端
//3.改进：直接修改Vehicle类，改动的代码会比较少=＞方案3
class RoadVehicle {
    public void run(String vehicle) {
        System.out.println(vehicle + "在公路上运行...");
    }
}

class AirVehicle {
    public void run(String vehicle) {
        System.out.println(vehicle + "在天空上运行...");
    }
}

class WaterVehicle {
    public void run(String vehicle) {
        System.out.println(vehicle + "在水上运行...");
    }
}
